By Suleman Chitera
The Centre for Democracy and Economic Development Initiatives (CDEDI) has delivered a scathing assessment of the administration of Lazarus Chakwera, branding it Malawi’s “worst mistake” and accusing it of failing to meet the high expectations citizens placed upon it.
CDEDI Executive Director Sylvester Namiwa said the Chakwera-led government fell far short of delivering meaningful economic transformation and governance reforms.
Namiwa made the remarks when asked to compare the former Malawi Congress Party (MCP) administration under Dr. Chakwera with the current Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government led by Peter Mutharika.
“It would be an insult to President Mutharika to compare the two administrations,” Namiwa said, arguing that the previous government failed to capitalise on the overwhelming public goodwill and reform mandate it received upon taking office.
‘Failed Promise of Change’
According to Namiwa, Malawians had hoped for a decisive break from economic hardship, corruption, and governance inefficiencies. Instead, he contended, the country experienced deepening economic strain, high cost of living, and limited tangible improvements in public service delivery.
He claimed that the Chakwera administration struggled with policy implementation, economic management, and restoring public trust, despite campaigning on a strong reformist agenda.
“The expectations were enormous. Malawians wanted structural change and decisive leadership. What they got was disappointment,” he said.
Caution on Current Administration
Despite his strong criticism of the former government, Namiwa was quick to clarify that his remarks should not be interpreted as an endorsement that everything is currently in order.
He stressed that Malawi continues to grapple with serious socio-economic challenges, including poverty, unemployment, and slow economic growth.
“This does not mean all is well now. The country still faces significant hurdles in uplifting the lives of ordinary citizens,” he added.
Ongoing Debate
The remarks are likely to intensify political debate as stakeholders continue to assess the performance of successive administrations. With economic recovery and governance reforms remaining central to public discourse, comparisons between past and present leadership are expected to shape the national conversation in the months ahead.
CDEDI’s intervention adds to growing civil society commentary scrutinising both former and current governments, underscoring persistent public demand for accountable leadership and measurable economic progress.

















