By Draxon Maloya,
Lilongwe, Malawi – A scathing opinion piece by Malawian social media activist Pemphero Mphande has ignited a fierce debate over the suitability of former President Peter Mutharika to lead the country.
Mphande’s article, which has gone viral on various social media platforms, accuses Mutharika, President Lazarus Chakwera, and the late Vice President Saulos Chilima of incompetence, corruption, and failure to address pressing national issues.
In his piece, Mphande pulls no punches. He argues that Mutharika, despite his experience, is too old and ineffective to govern. “We cannot afford to be led by someone who belongs to a bygone era,” Mphande writes. “His past term in office demonstrated a lack of vision and an inability to tackle critical challenges,”
President Chakwera, who promised sweeping reforms during his campaign, has also come under fire. Mphande accuses him of failing to deliver on those promises and struggling to address the country’s economic woes. “Malawians are tired of empty rhetoric,” Mphande asserts. “We need action, not just words.”
The late Vice President Chilima’s legacy is another point of contention. Mphande claims that Chilima’s party, the United Transformation Movement (UTM), lacks direction and is torn apart by internal power struggles. “Chilima’s vision is being exploited for political gain,” Mphande contends. “We deserve better leadership.”
The opinion piece has drawn both praise and criticism. Supporters hail Mphande as a courageous truth-teller, while others accuse him of being divisive and disrespectful. The hashtag #MphandeOpinionPiece has trended on social media, with Malawians passionately weighing in on the country’s political future.
As the 2025 elections approach, Mphande’s call for informed choices and accountability resonates with many. Malawians are grappling with complex decisions, and the debate sparked by this article underscores the urgency of addressing the nation’s challenges.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this opinion piece are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the stance of this publication.
