Analysis of the Smartmatic and Newsmax Settlement: implications for media integrity and accountability

By Burnett Munthali

The recent settlement between Smartmatic and Newsmax, announced just as jury selection was set to begin for their defamation case, marks a significant moment in the ongoing saga surrounding allegations of election fraud and misinformation following the 2020 presidential election. This analysis examines the implications of this settlement, the broader context of defamation lawsuits related to voting technology, and the potential impact on media integrity and accountability

• Kunkuyu briefs the press on electoral issues
  Minister of Information and Digitalisation, Moses Kunkuyu has refuted claims by opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Alliance for Democracy (AFORD) and UTM that government intend to rig 2025 elections through dubious awarding of contract to foreign companies and procurement of electoral devices. Kunkuyu was speaking in Blantyre on Friday, during a press briefing. The…
• Malawi, Mozambique sign trade agreement
  Malawi and Mozambique Friday signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on Simplified Trade Regime (STR) that aims at improving bilateral trade relations between two countries. Minister of Trade and Industry, Sosten Gengwe, who signed on behalf of the Malawi government at a ceremony held at Lilongwe Hotel, said the signing of the MoU is significant…
• Register to choose leaders of your choice-CHRR
  Centre for Human Rights and Rehabilitation (CHRR), District Coordinator for Dedza, Lloyd Ndalama has urged people to go and register for them to choose leaders of their choice during the September 16th, 2025 General Elections. Ndalama made the call on Thursday at Kanyenda area under Traditional Authority Kasumbu during awareness campaign to help people understand…
• Analyzing the Smartmatic bribery allegations: Implications for elections and company reputation
  By Burnett Munthali Recent allegations against Smartmatic, a prominent election technology company, raise significant concerns about the integrity of electoral processes and the company’s controversial history. U.S. prosecutors have accused three individuals, including Smartmatic employee Roger Piñate, of conspiring to pay over $1 million in bribes to Juan Andres Bautista, the former chair of the…
• UDF Party to Address Future Political Alliances Soon
  By Burnett Munthali The United Democratic Front (UDF) has announced that it will soon inform Malawians about its future regarding political alliances. This will be after the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) meets to deliberate on the matter. UDF’s Secretary General, Genelino Lemani, told MIJ Online that party leaders will hold a meeting in the…
• Three opposition parties and Civil Society push for reforms in MEC and investigation into Chilima plane crash
  By Burnett Munthali In a bold political move, three opposition parties—the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Alliance for Democracy (AFORD), and the United Transformation Movement (UTM)—have teamed up with several civil society organizations to exert pressure on President Lazarus Chakwera. The coalition is demanding a thorough commission of inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the plane…
• Analysis of the Smartmatic and Newsmax Settlement: implications for media integrity and accountability
  By Burnett Munthali The recent settlement between Smartmatic and Newsmax, announced just as jury selection was set to begin for their defamation case, marks a significant moment in the ongoing saga surrounding allegations of election fraud and misinformation following the 2020 presidential election. This analysis examines the implications of this settlement, the broader context of…

Smartmatic, a voting technology company, filed a lawsuit against Newsmax in November 2021, alleging that the right-wing news network disseminated false claims about the company’s involvement in election fraud. This lawsuit is part of a broader trend where several media outlets and public figures have faced legal repercussions for promoting unfounded allegations regarding the integrity of the 2020 election. The case gained attention after a judge allowed the claims to proceed in early 2023, leading to the impending trial that would have addressed the credibility of Newsmax’s reporting.

The legal landscape for these cases has been complicated. Judge Eric Davis’s ruling allowed Smartmatic to pursue its claims against Newsmax but barred punitive damages, stating that there was no evidence of “evil intent” from Newsmax, which is a critical standard for such claims. Furthermore, Newsmax’s defense rested on the assertion that it was merely relaying statements made by guests rather than making false claims itself.

The specifics of the settlement remain undisclosed, yet it signifies a retreat from a potentially damaging trial for Newsmax, particularly after Fox News faced a high-profile settlement of $787.5 million with Dominion Voting Systems for similar defamation claims. The choice to settle may reflect a desire to avoid the uncertainties of a jury trial and the risk of a ruling that could further tarnish the network’s reputation and financial stability.

Broader implications

1) Media accountability

The settlements in these cases underscore the challenges media organizations face when reporting on contentious and potentially misleading claims. As various outlets navigate the fine line between news reporting and the propagation of misinformation, the outcomes of these lawsuits may set precedents for how media entities are held accountable for misleading information, particularly in a politically charged environment. The trend of settling could compel other networks to rethink their editorial practices to avoid costly litigation, potentially leading to more responsible reporting.

2) Public trust in media

As defamation lawsuits like those from Smartmatic and Dominion capture public attention, they could significantly affect public confidence in media outlets. If networks are perceived as spreading falsehoods without accountability, audiences may become increasingly skeptical of the information they consume. This erosion of trust can have long-term consequences for democratic discourse and public engagement, leading to a more polarized society where misinformation thrives unchecked.

3) Future legal battles

The resolution of the Smartmatic case does not diminish the ongoing litigation involving Dominion and other parties. Dominion’s upcoming trial against Newsmax in April 2025 will likely continue to attract significant scrutiny and may further shape the legal landscape surrounding defamation and media accountability. As the dust settles on the Smartmatic settlement, the results of these ongoing legal battles will remain pivotal in determining how media outlets report on contentious political issues and the potential repercussions of disseminating misinformation.

The settlement between Smartmatic and Newsmax signifies more than just a legal resolution; it highlights the precarious balance media organizations must maintain between free speech and responsible reporting. In an era where misinformation can have severe implications for public trust and democratic integrity, the outcomes of such cases will be critical in shaping the future of media accountability. As the legal ramifications continue to unfold, stakeholders within the media landscape must reflect on their role in informing the public and the ethical responsibilities that accompany that duty.