Friday, June 9Malawi's top news source


Counsel Khumbo Soko Writes:

That the Constitutional right to freedom of expression covers even the right to publish offensive material is so trite and mundane, it is almost in danger of losing its urgency. This being the case, the State should be extremely slow in unleashing its mighty power in pursuing people suspected of having published offensive material against those in charge of state affairs. In my view, and for the avoidance of doubt, this includes the personages of the President, his Deputy and other members of the cabinet. It’s altogether quite easy to justify arrests of such people by citing some laws and in some instances hazy moral principles that those in authority deserve our respect.

But this kind of heavy handed approach, if left unchecked, will have a lasting chilling effect on the space that the Constitution has reserved for citizens to robustly engage with their governing proxies. This of necessity means that the right for people to criticise elected public officials, sometimes in caustic, illegitimate and unfair terms should rarely be interfered with through arrests and prosecution. The reason why this approach is objectionable should be obvious to any person who fancies himself as a defender of our liberal democratic constitutional order. It arrogates, ultimately, the power to determine what constitutes legitimate criticism of the State to the State itself. And this is clearly untenable.

The bar for interfering with citizens’ right to free speech should be high. For instance, law enforcement agencies should be permitted to move in where one, under the guise of free speech, calls for a destruction of certain groups in society (hate speech if you would rather.)

When we say that harsh criticism of public officials comes with the territory we simply mean this: that people have a duty and a right to interrogate how their governors are exercising the constitutional stewardship of managing affairs of the state. The safer and constitutionally sound option, therefore, is not to muzzle free expression, but rather for those who can’t stand acerbic criticism and the harsh light of public scrutiny not to seek public office.

We shouldn’t be cheering when the State arrests someone for criticising elected officials. It should make all of us sad for the retrogressive constriction of the public space.

My views do not lend any moral support to those who find pleasure in uttering obscene words against others. For what it’s worth, i would choose my words differently myself. Resort to obscenities and verbal abuse says more about the perpetrator of such than its subject. But my moral indignation at such kind of crass acts can be no basis for approbating state action of dubious constitutional validity.

I am told, although I have no way of confirming it, that the Tonse administration has the ignominy of having scooped the award of an administration with most arrests targeting free speech this far. Why anyone would want this record for themselves is rather puzzling.

As was once stated, even when we do not agree with what people are saying, let’s defend their right to say it.

A very worried citizen.

Related News
Lets Not Forget Why US/British Killed Muammar Gaddafi?

Gaddafi was certainly not killed for humanitarian reasons. He wanted to empower Africa. He had a plan to create a Read more


Story by a concerned bidder Yamikani Nicholas Kachingwe. The Department of Disaster Management(DoDMA) an institution under the office of the Read more

Religious Faith Are Masters Of Pastoral Letters And Corruption

Malawian churches are the masters of pastoral letters. Both CCAP and Catholics are well known for producing the best pastoral Read more

ACB And Ombudsman Is Totally Different Analyst Tells Martha Chizuma

By Chikuluwaza Political Contributor Resign is better than being fired In fact ACB is totally different from Ombudsman where Martha Read more

Sattar Is Just A Sheer Scapegoat, Curing Symptom To Temporarily Hide The Pain

By Apawo Kwayera WHY BASHING SATTAR IS JUST CURING SYMPOTOMS Social media activists—mostly Idriss Ali Nassah, Onjezani Kenani, Joshua Mbere Read more

Martha Chizuma Isn’t Above The Law, Let Legality And Constitutionalism Prevail

Opinion by James Kayuni, student of law at University of Nairobi in Kenya. There is, of course, something questionable about Read more

Under Chizuma’s Leadership, Is There Anything Tangible ACB Can Show?

By Attwell Chilangambwa Soon, Martha Chizuma's contract as the boss at the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) will be expiring and debate Read more

Is jealousy, personal vendetta driving Malawi social media influencers hatred against businessman Sattar?

If you read what people such as Onjezani Kenani, Kondwani Munthali, Idris Ali Nassah and Joshua Mbele posts on social Read more

NCA Report Against Sattar Is A Hearsay No Proof Of Evidence, Sattar’s Lawyers Ready To Challenge In Court

By Jivason Kazipatike I have seen extracts of a document purported to have been filed by National Crimes Agency in Read more

Sattar Case, Names Mentioned Are Mistaken, Hearsay And Scapegoat

By Nzondi Lungu Opinion Alot has been said, we are even scared to comment because you will say either we Read more

News To Read

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *