By Burnett Munthali
For the first time in Malawi’s democratic history, the 2025 elections will feature three formidable presidential pairs: Lazarus Chakwera and Michael Usi (Mumba), Dalitso Kabambe and Bishop Martin Mtumbuka, and Peter Mutharika and Dr. Jane Ansah.
This electoral season is shaping up to be one of the most consequential, with candidates who bring varying levels of experience, ideology, and credibility to the table.
When analyzing the political field, it becomes clear that while Chakwera remains a key contender due to his incumbency, his administration has not lived up to the promise that swept him into power in 2020.
Under Chakwera’s leadership, Malawi has experienced prolonged economic hardship, including spiraling inflation, persistent fuel shortages, and a general breakdown of public trust in the Tonse Alliance’s ability to govern.
Many Malawians feel betrayed by the unfulfilled promises of jobs, reduced corruption, and improved public services.
It is this backdrop of disappointment that opens a path for alternative leadership—one that is rooted in proven economic expertise and governance experience.
Dalitso Kabambe, a technocrat with a deep understanding of economic systems, brings a refreshing prospect for stability and reform.
His partnership with Bishop Martin Mtumbuka, a morally upright and intellectually grounded figure, further strengthens their ticket and appeals to Malawians yearning for integrity and compassion in leadership.
Kabambe’s record at the Reserve Bank of Malawi is marked by macroeconomic stabilization and financial discipline.
With Mtumbuka’s influence in moral and social spheres, this pairing offers not just economic recovery, but also ethical clarity and vision for Malawi.
On the other side, Peter Mutharika, though a former president, still commands a significant support base, especially in the Southern Region.
His selection of Dr. Jane Ansah—despite the controversies around the 2019 elections—adds legal and governance depth to the ticket.
Ansah remains a highly educated, experienced legal mind whose career cannot be reduced to one episode.
Together, Mutharika and Ansah project a return to law, order, and infrastructural development, especially following the political chaos and economic mismanagement of the past five years.
Chakwera’s main strength in 2025 lies in his running mate, Michael Usi (also known as Mumba), who continues to resonate with many Malawians due to his humble beginnings, creativity, and deep connection with grassroots communities.
However, even the energy and goodwill Usi brings cannot erase the stains of unfulfilled promises and governance failures that define Chakwera’s presidency.
It is therefore evident that the two strongest tickets, with the potential to turn Malawi’s fortunes around, are Kabambe-Mtumbuka and Mutharika-Ansah.
Chakwera’s continued presence on the ballot is a reminder of missed opportunities and unkept promises—despite being led by a vice president who could have brought positive change had he been at the helm.
In conclusion, as Malawians head to the polls on September 16, 2025, the decision is not merely between political parties, but between continued stagnation and a path toward credible reform. In that context, Kabambe-Mtumbuka and Mutharika-Ansah stand as the best hope for national recovery, renewal, and unity—while Chakwera’s candidacy represents the dangers of repeating history.
