Concerns rise over the Special Forces Command’s role as opposition fears restrictions on campaigning and political freedoms.
By Burnett Munthali
As Uganda prepares for its 2026 elections, opposition leaders have expressed growing concern over the influence and power of the Special Forces Command (SFC).
Described by some as a “shadow army within the army,” the SFC is perceived to operate independently and is reportedly answerable only to President Yoweri Museveni.
Opposition figures fear that the elite unit could be used to intimidate, restrict, or otherwise hinder their ability to campaign freely across the country.
The SFC’s involvement in political matters has been a point of contention for years, raising questions about the neutrality of Uganda’s security forces during election periods.
Critics argue that the unit’s structure and direct loyalty to the president give it unprecedented authority, which could be leveraged to suppress dissent and influence electoral outcomes.
As campaigns approach, opposition parties are calling for transparency and assurances that all political actors will be allowed to operate without harassment or interference.
Analysts note that the presence of a powerful, presidential-controlled force creates an uneven playing field, heightening tensions and fears of potential conflict during the election season.
Civil society organizations and international observers have also expressed concern over reports of intimidation by specialized security units, urging the Ugandan government to uphold democratic principles.
The coming months are expected to test the balance between security, political freedom, and the integrity of Uganda’s electoral process.
Opposition leaders continue to warn that unless safeguards are implemented, the SFC’s role could significantly impact the fairness and credibility of the 2026 elections.
