By Mabvuto Kalawa, Malawi Freedom Network Correspondent
For the past thirty years, since the dawn of multiparty politics in Malawi, opposition party members have been walking out of the chamber to protest motions or support their fellow members who have been ordered to leave. But is this a good idea, or are they violating parliament’s standing orders and the rights of voters who elected them?
The recent walkout by Malawi Congress Party (MCP) parliamentarians has sparked debate among Malawians, who are questioning whether this tactic is effective in solving the country’s problems. Our correspondent spoke to voters, who expressed frustration with the habit.
Gift Mkochi of Pansi Village in Lilongwe said the practice is “very bad” and denies development to the people they represent. “There’s no need to walk out; they should stay and solve problems while in the chamber,” he said.
Thengeza concurred, saying walking out allows important bills to be passed easily by the government side. “The best way is to remain there and argue, not leave the chambers. Malawians need development, nothing else,” he said.
Group Village Headman Nduta suggested a law be formulated to recall MPs who continue this habit. “Recall provision must be there for us to vote again,” he said.
Mrs. Chricy Daka advocated for punishing MPs who walk out, saying they should be barred from contesting. “They must consult, not walk out. The problem is also on us voters; we should sign a memorandum of understanding with them during campaigns,” she said.
A teacher, speaking anonymously, questioned why MPs who walk out still receive allowances. “They must learn to practice contract and dialogue, not walk out. They’re killing us, voters,” he said.
However, Madalitso Yusuf argued that sometimes walking out is necessary if the government is playing tricks. “But it must be on an important issue, not when you’ve violated parliament orders,” he said.
As Malawi faces hunger, poor infrastructure, and healthcare challenges, the question remains: can walking out of parliament solve the country’s problems, or are MPs prioritizing personal interests?
