By Jones Gadama
The recent injunction granted to former President Dr. Lazarus Chakwera, preventing police from searching his Area 11 residence in Lilongwe over allegations of missing dogs reportedly stolen from State House, represents a troubling precedent that risks undermining the equitable application of law in Malawi.
This development calls for urgent and decisive intervention from the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) or the Attorney General to challenge and seek the vacation of this injunction, ensuring that no individual, regardless of stature, is placed above the law. The integrity of our justice system and the principle of equality before the law depend on such assertive actions.
The police have been conducting searches in various households across the country as part of their investigative mandates.
These searches, often necessary to uphold law and order, should apply uniformly across all citizens. There is no legitimate reason why former President Chakwera should be afforded special treatment or exemptions from lawful searches, especially when there are allegations implicating him in a matter of public interest.
The injunction effectively creates a legal shield that hinders the police from executing their duties and sets a dangerous example that could be exploited by others seeking to evade lawful scrutiny.
The Director of Public Prosecutions, vested with the constitutional mandate to oversee public prosecutions and ensure the enforcement of justice, must rise to the occasion and file an application in court to have the injunction vacated.
The Attorney General, as the government’s chief legal advisor, also holds a critical role in ensuring that such injunctions, which are not only legally questionable but also detrimental to governance and public confidence in the justice system, are promptly challenged.
Their combined efforts are pivotal in upholding the rule of law and maintaining public trust in the state’s capacity to enforce legal norms impartially.
Lwara says Chakwera deserve to be arrested to face the law
Moreover, the DPP’s role extends beyond this single case. There have been multiple injunctions obtained by Malawi Defence Force (MDF) officers and police commissioners who are resisting redeployment orders issued by the government.
These injunctions are similarly problematic as they obstruct lawful administrative decisions meant to enhance efficiency and accountability within security services.
By granting these injunctions, courts inadvertently empower a culture of resistance against legitimate government directives, which can breed institutional paralysis and undermine national security.
It is imperative that the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Attorney General proactively addresses these injunctions by initiating legal proceedings to have them vacated. Such action would send a clear message that the government will not tolerate attempts to circumvent lawful authority through the abuse of judicial processes.
The DPP must demonstrate a commitment to serving Malawians by ensuring that those entrusted with public responsibilities comply with government policies and do not misuse the courts to stall reforms.
The importance of vacating these injunctions cannot be overstated. First, it reaffirms the principle that no individual or group is above the law. This principle is foundational to democratic governance and the protection of citizens’ rights.
When injunctions obstruct lawful actions without sound legal basis, they erode the public’s confidence in justice and governance. Second, vacating these injunctions facilitates the smooth functioning of government operations, especially in critical sectors such as security and law enforcement.
It removes unnecessary legal hurdles that compromise the effectiveness of public institutions.
In addition, allowing such injunctions to stand unchecked may encourage a proliferation of legal challenges aimed at delaying or derailing government initiatives.
This can create a precedent that undermines the executive’s ability to govern effectively and respond swiftly to national issues. The DPP and Attorney General must therefore act decisively to curtail this trend, reinforcing the rule of law and the authority of lawful government actions.
The current injunction involving Dr. Chakwera’s property is emblematic of a wider challenge facing the government’s efforts to enforce accountability and implement reforms.
The Director of Public Prosecutions and Attorney General must view this not as an isolated legal matter, but as part of a broader imperative to uphold justice and good governance.
Their intervention will be critical in ensuring that investigations proceed unhindered and that all citizens are held accountable in accordance with the law.
To serve Malawians better, the DPP must also work closely with other arms of government, including the judiciary and security agencies, to establish clear protocols on the issuance and challenge of injunctions related to public interest matters.
This collaboration will help prevent the misuse of injunctions as tools for obstruction and foster a legal environment conducive to transparent and effective governance.
The injunction preventing the search of former President Chakwera’s residence, alongside others obtained by MDF officers and police commissioners resisting redeployment, represents a serious challenge to Malawi’s rule of law and governance.
The Director of Public Prosecutions or the Attorney General must urgently intervene to challenge and vacate these injunctions.
Doing so is essential not only for the enforcement of justice in individual cases but also for maintaining the integrity of government operations and public confidence in the legal system.
Upholding the principle that no one is above the law will strengthen Malawi’s democracy and pave the way for a more just and accountable society.
