By Suleman Chitera
BLANTYRE, MALAWI — Public frustration is rising as citizens question what they describe as selective attention by activists and institutions, accusing them of prioritizing less critical issues while neglecting serious crimes affecting ordinary people.
Read more BMTV accuses HRDC of working against DPP
According to sentiments circulating on social media and in communities, many Malawians are asking why issues involving foreign embassies—particularly those of the United States and the United Kingdom—are receiving significant attention, while major incidents tied to public safety and justice appear to be overlooked.
Related stories HRDC’s “Natural Death” Was Self-Inflicted
Critics argue that there is a troubling pattern where “headline-grabbing” or politically convenient stories are amplified, while weightier matters such as kidnappings, violent crimes, and unresolved cases fail to trigger the same level of outrage or action.
One case frequently cited is that of Agape, who was reportedly kidnapped. Many are questioning why there were no large-scale demonstrations or sustained pressure to uncover the truth and hold those responsible accountable.
Other news Activist Suleman Chitera Fires Strong Warning at HRDC Over ‘Destabilization Agenda’
“When serious incidents happen, we expect protests, investigations, and pressure on authorities to deliver answers. But what we’re seeing is selective activism,” said one concerned citizen.
Additionally, some observers are criticizing how relatively minor incidents—such as altercations involving public officials—are elevated in public discourse, overshadowing more pressing national concerns.
Dont miss HRDC Accused of Acting as MCP Agents After Defending Arrested Opposition Figures
Social and governance analysts warn that such inconsistencies risk eroding public trust in both civil society organizations and the media, especially if priorities appear misaligned with the realities faced by citizens.
However, others defend the right of organizations to choose the issues they engage with, noting that decisions are often influenced by available evidence, capacity, and strategic considerations.
Read this “Where Did Our Fuel Go? Malawi Questions Missing 27.7 Million Litres from DRC Delivery ”
Even so, the central question remains: Are institutions and activists truly serving the broader public interest, or is there a pattern of selective focus?
As pressure mounts, the demand for accountability, transparency, and fair prioritization of national issues continues to grow.
By Suleman Chitera
Political & Social Commentator
