By Burnett Munthali
Prominent lawyer Alexius Kamangila has written a formal letter to the Malawi Law Society (MLS), requesting urgent access to crucial information regarding ongoing legal proceedings and allegations of professional misconduct involving Justice Kenan Manda of the High Court of Malawi. In his letter, Kamangila expresses his concerns about a lawsuit filed against him by Justice Manda, which he believes is illegal and undermines his rights as both a citizen and an officer of the court.
- Jumah urges Malawians to destroy chains of hostageBy Vincent Gunde The Revolutionary and patriotic citizen of Malawi Bantu Saunders Jumah, has urged patriotic Malawians living in diaspora…
- Concerned Moslem accuses Salima Sheikh of bringing politics into IslamBy Vincent Gunde A Concerned Moslem has accused Sheikh Sosola of Salima of taking Malawi Congress Party (MCP) politics into…
- Mpinganjira’s family dismisses fake competition allegationsBy Burnett Munthali The family of Thomson Mpinganjira has refuted claims circulating on social media that it is sponsoring a…
- STA Mbera of Balaka diesDeath has been announced of Sub Traditional Authority (STA)Mbera of Balaka. STA Mbera real name Wailesi Mbwana died in the…
- Government sets target for Ntcheu StadiumGovernment has set 30th June, 2025, as a deadline for Ntcheu Stadium to commence some of its operations. Deputy Minister…
- The Rise And Fall Of Tonse AllianceTable of Contents Part 1: The rise of the Tonse Alliance Part 2: Governance under the Tonse Alliance Part 3:…
- Patel calls on Muslims to show mercy to the underprivilegedBy Dean Chisambo The Chairperson of the Sunn Foundation, Aamir Patel, has urged Muslims to show mercy and extend support…
Kamangila’s letter emphasizes the need for an “effective legal remedy,” highlighting the seriousness of the case against him and its potential impact on his professional reputation. He asserts that the lawsuit in question not only jeopardizes his legal standing but also calls into question the independence and impartiality of Malawi’s judiciary.
In his request, Kamangila seeks the following specific information from the MLS:
- Committee Task Force Report: Kamangila asks for details regarding the report produced by the committee tasked with investigating allegations of professional misconduct against Justice Kenan Manda. This report, according to Kamangila, is essential to understanding the broader context of the legal actions initiated by Manda.
- Complaints Against Justice Kenan Manda: He also requests access to any complaints that the MLS may have received from its members regarding their dealings with Justice Manda, particularly in cases where Manda’s conduct has come under scrutiny.
- Response from the Chief Justice: Kamangila inquires about any correspondence between the MLS and the Chief Justice on the matter of Justice Manda’s professional conduct. This information, he argues, is critical in ensuring transparency and accountability within the judiciary.
As an officer of the court, Kamangila stresses that his right to an independent and impartial judiciary must be upheld, and he expects a prompt and thorough investigation into the matter. He underscores the importance of this issue not only for his case but for the integrity of the judicial system as a whole.
Kamangila concludes his letter with a plea for an “expeditious response” from the Malawi Law Society, underscoring the urgency of the matter. He remains hopeful that the MLS will take swift action to address his concerns and shed light on the professional conduct of Justice Kenan Manda.
This case is likely to attract significant attention in Malawi’s legal circles, as it raises questions about judicial accountability and the treatment of legal professionals in the country. Kamangila’s bold move to challenge the actions of a High Court justice signals a deepening need for transparency and reform within Malawi’s justice system.
As this matter unfolds, it will be crucial for the Malawi Law Society to ensure that all parties involved receive a fair and impartial investigation, thereby reinforcing public confidence in the nation’s judiciary.
