By Burnett Munthali
The ongoing political maneuvers in Malawi raise critical questions about governance, democracy, and the rights of the elderly.
Over the years, Malawians have witnessed a pattern of constitutional changes that serve the interests of those in power rather than the collective good of the nation.
First, election dates were altered, shifting the political landscape and creating uncertainties around the democratic process.
Then, the economy was reshaped through policies that often failed to address the suffering of ordinary citizens, deepening poverty and economic inequality.
Now, the government is attempting to introduce an age limit for presidential candidates, a move that many see as an effort to block specific individuals from contesting in future elections.
The Constitution of Malawi, in Section 40(1), guarantees every citizen the right to participate in the affairs of government, either directly or through freely chosen representatives.
This constitutional provision underscores the fundamental democratic principle that leadership should be determined by the will of the people, not by arbitrary legal restrictions.
Introducing an age limit for presidential candidates contradicts the very essence of democracy by excluding capable and experienced individuals solely based on age.
Such a law would amount to discrimination against the elderly, violating their political rights and depriving the country of their wisdom and leadership.
Malawians must recognize that dealing with an arrogant government requires collective action and unwavering civic engagement.
History has shown that governments that ignore the will of the people often face resistance, protests, and ultimately political consequences.
Citizens can challenge such discriminatory laws through legal means, advocacy, and mobilization of public opinion.
Engaging the judiciary to interpret the constitutionality of the proposed age limit is one avenue that Malawians can pursue.
Furthermore, active participation in parliamentary debates, public consultations, and policy discussions can help amplify the people’s voice against unjust laws.
The power of the people remains the strongest weapon against any form of political oppression.
Democracy thrives when citizens refuse to be passive observers and instead take an active role in shaping their governance.
If Malawians unite in opposition to discriminatory constitutional amendments, the government will be forced to reconsider its actions.
Ultimately, the fate of Malawi’s democracy lies in the hands of its people, who must demand fairness, inclusivity, and respect for constitutional principles.
