
By Staff Reporter
The High Court’s Financial Crimes Division has rejected an application by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) to discontinue the high-profile corruption and financial crimes case involving Chinese national Lin Yunhua, ruling that the request had no legal basis.
In a ruling delivered on 13 July 2026, Justice Redson Kapindu said the ACB had relied on Section 81 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Code, a provision that applies to subordinate courts and not the High Court.
Justice Kapindu further stated that the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) already has constitutional authority to discontinue criminal proceedings without first seeking permission from the High Court.
The judge described the ACB’s application as an unnecessary use of the court’s time and an abuse of court process.COURT ORDERS ACB TO REARREST ZAMEER KARIM
The ACB had argued that it wanted to discontinue the case to allow the Malawi Prison Service to complete disciplinary proceedings against prison officers suspected of misconduct linked to the matter.
However, Justice Kapindu ruled that the prison officers are merely witnesses in the case and that any disciplinary action against them should not delay or affect the prosecution of Lin Yunhua.
Lin Yunhua is accused of offering a K30 million bribe and promising to complete the prison chief’s house while detained at Maula Prison in 2019. Prosecutors allege the bribe was intended to influence prison authorities to persuade a judge to impose a lighter sentence.
Following the ruling, the court ordered that the corruption case should proceed.Former Immigration Permits Chief Arrested by ACB Over Alleged Permit Fee Irregularities
The decision comes shortly after the Malawi Law Society publicly criticized both the Anti-Corruption Bureau and the Director of Public Prosecutions, accusing them of attempting to improperly exercise prosecutorial powers in a bid to terminate the case.
The ruling is expected to reignite debate over prosecutorial independence and the handling of high-profile corruption cases in Malawi, with legal observers viewing the judgment as a significant affirmation of judicial oversight and adherence to due process.ACB Probes K5.5 Billion Cash Withdrawals in Amaryllis Hotel Deal, Suspects Corruption and Money Laundering


Leave a Reply